<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fae &#8211; Help! Google Friend Connect or Networked Blogs??</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wiccamoms.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wiccamoms.com/?p=1650</link>
	<description>Two Wiccan Mothers Blog About Life, Love, Parenting, Paganism, And Everything Else.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 06:59:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mussie</title>
		<link>http://wiccamoms.com/?p=1650&#038;cpage=1#comment-1738</link>
		<dc:creator>mussie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiccamoms.com/?p=1650#comment-1738</guid>
		<description>Obviously I&#039;m biased,  but why do you need to choose?  Friend Connect&#039;s strategy is to integrate as many networks as possible.  E.g.  twitter,  etc.

We want an open social web.

And we would be happy to integrate Networked Blogs (we provide a programming interface so they can easily do this)

I would keep both,  and ask &quot;Networked Blogs&quot;  to integrate  so that there are fewer silos.

Best,

Mussie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously I&#8217;m biased,  but why do you need to choose?  Friend Connect&#8217;s strategy is to integrate as many networks as possible.  E.g.  twitter,  etc.</p>
<p>We want an open social web.</p>
<p>And we would be happy to integrate Networked Blogs (we provide a programming interface so they can easily do this)</p>
<p>I would keep both,  and ask &#8220;Networked Blogs&#8221;  to integrate  so that there are fewer silos.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Mussie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
